
More bike lanes? No thanks
L.A. should treat cyclists as motorists' equals,
not as pesky afterthoughts.
By Will Campbell for the LA
Times - May 19,
2007
WILL
CAMPBELL is more than 900 miles toward his
goal of bicycling 2,007
miles around Los Angeles this year. He writes
at Wildbell.com and Blogging.la.
TO EXPERIENCE the full dysfunction of Los Angeles
cycling, there's no better place than the Los
Angeles River Bikeway.
Its northernmost four miles, from Griffith
Park to Atwater Village, are a pedaling paradise:
smooth pavement, lighting, a dedicated bridge
over Los Feliz Boulevard. But cross Fletcher
Avenue and the riding gets rough. The aged
asphalt is in various stages of disrepair,
and cyclists are forced to negotiate a number
of rough drainage ditches. At the bike path's
southern end, riders are unceremoniously dumped
back onto Riverside Drive in the shadows of
the Golden State and Pasadena freeways miles
from downtown, Dodger Stadium or any other
destination.
The
Fletcher Divide, which has aged disgracefully
over five years during
three mayoral administrations,
illustrates how glacially Los Angeles is
integrating cycling into its transportation
grid. L.A.,
which averages 329 sunny, bike-friendly days
a year, should be one of the most forward-thinking
cities on the subject. Instead, greater Los
Angeles remains a vast patchwork of bikeways,
bike lanes and bike routes that haven't coalesced — as
anyone who took part in Bike to Work Day
this week surely noticed.
That's
not to say nothing is happening. The city
has an 11-year-old Bicycle
Plan, and city
and county officials cite the proliferation
of on-street bike lanes as an example of
the great strides being made. Yet the numbers
leave
a lot to be desired. Of Los Angeles County's
6,400 miles of surface streets, only 481
miles have bike lanes (320 inside the city
limits — five
fewer miles than much smaller Tucson). In
milk carton terms, if L.A.'s total street mileage
equaled half a gallon, bike lanes would constitute
a sip of about 4 ounces.
Whether one sees that glass as half full or
half empty, I personally wish the city would
just stop filling it. Quit while it's behind
and not stripe another inch of bike lane. And
yes, this is coming from an avid recreational
and commuter cyclist who has pedaled thousands
of miles over 20 years.
Here's why: By law, my bicycle is considered
a vehicle with the same right to the road as
your car or truck. Bike lanes provide an arguable
buffer zone of safety (as well as a great place
for people to put their garbage containers
on trash day), but they marginalize cyclists
and reinforce their status as second-class
commuters who shouldn't be on the road.
Some bike lanes even put cyclists at greater
risk, such as the newest lanes along Santa
Monica Boulevard between Century City and the
San Diego Freeway. Cars have to make quick
cuts across the bike lane to get to side streets,
shopping centers and parking spaces. The eastbound
bike lane literally vanishes midblock, as if
the Department of Transportation ran out of
paint before reaching Avenue of the Stars.
L.A.
Department of Transportation officials quote
chapter and verse how the city's
newest
bike lanes safely conform to state regulations — and
not counting the disappearing act I mentioned,
I'm sure that's true. But it's not enough.
What
will be enough? I'll never be satisfied until
Silverados and Schwinns
can peacefully
coexist on all surface streets. But an update
of the city Bicycle Plan — something
the plan stipulated should have been done last
year — is a good place to start. Our
city and county transportation agencies should
be trying out fresher bike-transit concepts,
such as shared-use arrows, known as sharrows,
and bicycle-priority streets, also called
bike boulevards.

Already
successful in San Francisco, sharrows have
a bike icon topped
by two chevrons painted
directly on the road. Instead of creating
separation, they promote awareness that the
right lane
is to be shared by motorists and cyclists — and
they're easier and less costly to implement
than bike lanes.
A network of seven bike boulevards has been
used to great effect in Berkeley. All types
of vehicles are allowed, but these designated
roadways have been enhanced with traffic
signals, signage and traffic control for
bike safety
and convenience. Here in Los Angeles, 4th
Street is practically bike-boulevard ready
from Vermont
Boulevard to La Brea Avenue. Another could
be Fountain Avenue between Silver Lake and
West Hollywood.
A citywide grid of sharrows that complement
and connect bike boulevards and off-street
bikeways would go a long way toward fostering
a civic culture that embraces cycling rather
than treating bikes as a transportation
afterthought.

|